[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971971#action_12971971
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-3323:
------------------------------------

Strange... can you grep the NN logs for that directory and try to figure it 
out? Usually that kind of error happens if someone deletes the file while 
you're writing it.

> OOME in master splitting logs
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3323
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3323
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: master
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.0
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Todd Lipcon
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.90.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-3323.4.txt, hbase-3323.5.txt, hbase-3323.txt, 
> hbase-3323.txt, hbase-3323.txt, sizes.png
>
>
> In testing a RS failure under heavy increment workload I ran into an OOME 
> when the master was splitting the logs.
> In this test case, I have exactly 136 bytes per log entry in all the logs, 
> and the logs are all around 66-74MB). With a batch size of 3 logs, this means 
> the master is loading about 500K-600K edits per log file. Each edit ends up 
> creating 3 byte[] objects, the references for which are each 8 bytes of RAM, 
> so we have 160 (136+8*3) bytes per edit used by the byte[]. For each edit we 
> also allocate a bunch of other objects: one HLog$Entry, one WALEdit, one 
> ArrayList, one LinkedList$Entry, one HLogKey, and one KeyValue. Overall this 
> works out to 400 bytes of overhead per edit. So, with the default settings on 
> this fairly average workload, the 1.5M log entries takes about 770MB of RAM. 
> Since I had a few log files that were a bit larger (around 90MB) it exceeded 
> 1GB of RAM and I got an OOME.
> For one, the 400 bytes per edit overhead is pretty bad, and we could probably 
> be a lot more efficient. For two, we should actually account this rather than 
> simply having a configurable "batch size" in the master.
> I think this is a blocker because I'm running with fairly default configs 
> here and just killing one RS made the cluster fall over due to master OOME.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to