[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992269#comment-12992269
 ] 

Ted Dunning commented on HBASE-3465:
------------------------------------

The problem I had was not a matter of conflicting jars so much as that I wanted 
to have an hbase build that would accept my hadoop and related jars and not 
include its own unless I didn't provide something.

Maven makes this easy by having a "provided" scope for dependencies.  The only 
missing bit is some shell-fu to either include a default set of hadoop jars or 
env specified hadoop jars as desired.

I will produce a prototype when I have time to scratch.


> Hbase should use a HADOOP_HOME environment variable if available.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3465
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.0
>            Reporter: Ted Dunning
>             Fix For: 0.90.1, 0.92.0
>
>
> I have been burned a few times lately while developing code by having the 
> make sure that the hadoop jar in hbase/lib is exactly correct.  In my own 
> deployment, there are actually 3 jars and a native library to keep in sync 
> that hbase shouldn't have to know about explicitly.  A similar problem arises 
> when using stock hbase with CDH3 because of the security patches changing the 
> wire protocol.
> All of these problems could be avoided by not assuming that the hadoop 
> library is in the local directory.  Moreover, I think it might be possible to 
> assemble the distribution such that the compile time hadoop dependency is in 
> a cognate directory to lib and is referenced using a default value for 
> HADOOP_HOME.
> Does anybody have any violent antipathies to such a change?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to