[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006375#comment-13006375
]
Lars Francke commented on HBASE-1744:
-------------------------------------
I'm afraid I will finally have to say that I have no idea when I'll be able to
work on this. I've promised it for a long time but if anyone else wants to take
a stab at it feel free.
I'm pretty confident in the Thrift definition file I've come up with. It needs
some minor updates for the updated API (increment for example) and the delete
method is still missing one of the possible cases (I've documented it in the
patch) and filters are not implemented yet either.
I'll gladly answer any questions about this in case anyone wants to work on it
and if I have the time I'll improve the patch but I can't promise anything,
sorry :(
> Thrift server to match the new java api.
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1744
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: thrift
> Reporter: Tim Sell
> Assignee: Lars Francke
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.92.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-1744.preview.1.patch, thriftexperiment.patch
>
>
> This mutateRows, etc.. is a little confusing compared to the new cleaner java
> client.
> Thinking of ways to make a thrift client that is just as elegant. something
> like:
> void put(1:Bytes table, 2:TPut put) throws (1:IOError io)
> with:
> struct TColumn {
> 1:Bytes family,
> 2:Bytes qualifier,
> 3:i64 timestamp
> }
> struct TPut {
> 1:Bytes row,
> 2:map<TColumn, Bytes> values
> }
> This creates more verbose rpc than if the columns in TPut were just
> map<Bytes, map<Bytes, Bytes>>, but that is harder to fit timestamps into and
> still be intuitive from say python.
> Presumably the goal of a thrift gateway is to be easy first.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
