[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13692172#comment-13692172
]
stack commented on HBASE-8785:
------------------------------
bq. That is if maxSessionTimeout defined on ZK, not in our config.
Our config is zk config when we run the ensemble?
We bundle 3.4.5 in 0.95/trunk so I'd think the above pasted code would have an
effect?
Lets figure this one (I'm pretty sure I've seen sessions > 20 * tickTime (2s))
> revise zookeeper session timeout setting
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8785
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8785
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.95.1
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Fix For: 0.95.2
>
>
> Current ZK session timeout is set to 90sec., and the comment in the doc says:
> "This setting becomes zookeeper's 'maxSessionTimeout'". However, this comment
> is misleading - it doesn't always become maxSessionTimeout, min(our timeout,
> maxSessionTimeout) is chosen. Moreover, the default maxSessionTimeout in ZK
> that I'm looking at is 40s, so this setting doesn't do anything.
> Additionally, 40s. seems like a lot of time.
> 1) Should the comment be changed to tell the user to change ZK config if they
> want higher timeout?
> 2) Should the setting be revised down?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
