[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13695479#comment-13695479
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8809:
----------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12590034/8809-trunk.txt
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 3 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6161//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Include deletes in the scan (setRaw) method does not respect the time range
> or the filter
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8809
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8809
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scanners
> Reporter: Vasu Mariyala
> Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2, 0.94.10
>
> Attachments: 8809-0.94.txt, 8809-trunk.txt
>
>
> If a row has been deleted at time stamp 'T' and a scan with time range (0,
> T-1) is executed, it still returns the delete marker at time stamp 'T'. It is
> because of the code in ScanQueryMatcher.java
> {code}
> if (retainDeletesInOutput
> || (!isUserScan && (EnvironmentEdgeManager.currentTimeMillis() -
> timestamp) <= timeToPurgeDeletes)
> || kv.getMemstoreTS() > maxReadPointToTrackVersions) {
> // always include or it is not time yet to check whether it is OK
> // to purge deltes or not
> return MatchCode.INCLUDE;
> }
> {code}
> The assumption is scan (even with setRaw is set to true) should respect the
> filters and the time range specified.
> Please let me know if you think this behavior can be changed so that I can
> provide a patch for it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
