[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13025249#comment-13025249
]
stack commented on HBASE-1744:
------------------------------
@Lars Some fellas figured it ahead of you (smile). See
https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#label/hbase-issues/12f8cf7db44d14fb
> Thrift server to match the new java api.
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1744
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: thrift
> Reporter: Tim Sell
> Assignee: Lars Francke
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.92.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-1744.2.patch, HBASE-1744.preview.1.patch,
> thriftexperiment.patch
>
>
> This mutateRows, etc.. is a little confusing compared to the new cleaner java
> client.
> Thinking of ways to make a thrift client that is just as elegant. something
> like:
> void put(1:Bytes table, 2:TPut put) throws (1:IOError io)
> with:
> struct TColumn {
> 1:Bytes family,
> 2:Bytes qualifier,
> 3:i64 timestamp
> }
> struct TPut {
> 1:Bytes row,
> 2:map<TColumn, Bytes> values
> }
> This creates more verbose rpc than if the columns in TPut were just
> map<Bytes, map<Bytes, Bytes>>, but that is harder to fit timestamps into and
> still be intuitive from say python.
> Presumably the goal of a thrift gateway is to be easy first.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
