[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13707554#comment-13707554
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8909:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12592104/hbase-8909_v1.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified tests.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6318//console
This message is automatically generated.
> HBASE-6170 broke "hbase.regionserver.lease.period" config, we should support
> it for BC
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8909
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Enis Soztutar
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2
>
> Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch
>
>
> HBASE-6170 replaces "hbase.regionserver.lease.period" with the new
> configuration "hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period". We should support the
> old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old
> value. Remove it in 1.0.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
