[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Devaraj Das updated HBASE-9095:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: 9095-1.txt

Reattaching again since hadoopqa didn't pick it up the last time.
                
> AssignmentManager's handleRegion should respect the single threaded nature of 
> the processing
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9095
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9095
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Region Assignment
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>            Assignee: Devaraj Das
>             Fix For: 0.95.2
>
>         Attachments: 9095-1.txt, 9095-1.txt
>
>
> While debugging a case where a region was getting opened on a RegionServer 
> and then closed soon after (and then never re-opened anywhere thereafter), it 
> seemed like the processing in handleRegion to do with deletion of ZK nodes 
> should be non-asynchronous. This achieves two things:
> 1. The synchronous deletion prevents more than one processing on the same 
> event data twice. Assuming that we do get more than one notification (on 
> let's say, region OPENED event), the subsequent processing(s) in handleRegion 
> for the same znode would end up with a zookeeper node not found exception. 
> The return value of the data read would be null and that's already handled. 
> If it is asynchronous, it leads to issues like - master opens a region on a 
> certain RegionServer and soon after it sends that RegionServer a close for 
> the same region, and then the znode is deleted.
> 2. The deletion is currently handled in an executor service. This is 
> problematic since by design the events for a given region should be processed 
> in order. By delegating a part of the processing to executor service we are 
> somewhat violating this contract since there is no guarantee of the ordering 
> in the executor service executions...
> Thanks to [~jeffreyz] and [~enis] for the discussions on this issue.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to