[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13728132#comment-13728132
]
Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-8693:
-------------------------------------
bq. The javadoc still references the ByteRange stuff
Oh bother. I also just found one API remnant that uses ByteBuffer instead of
(ByteRange instead of) byte[]. I'll go back through one more time and clean it
up.
[~nkeywal] I see you uploaded a new patch, but diff show me no delta. Was there
some other change you intended?
> DataType: provide extensible type API
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8693
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8693
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Client
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
> Fix For: 0.95.2
>
> Attachments: 0001-HBASE-8693-Extensible-data-types-API.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-8693-Extensible-data-types-API.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-8693-Extensible-data-types-API.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-8693-Extensible-data-types-API.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-8693-Extensible-data-types-API.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-8693-Extensible-data-types-API.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-8693-Extensible-data-types-API.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-8693-Extensible-data-types-API.patch,
> 0002-HBASE-8693-example-Use-DataType-API-to-build-regionN.patch,
> KijiFormattedEntityId.java
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
