[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13730092#comment-13730092
]
stack commented on HBASE-8496:
------------------------------
On the design doc:
+ A whole byte to keep the type when the number of types will be small seems
profligate in our base type?
+ Two bytes of length ditto.
You could save 50% putting type and length together in a short?
Or is the tag length, the overall tags length?
What else changed in the design doc?
> Implement tags and the internals of how a tag should look like
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8496
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8496
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.95.2
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: Comparison.pdf, HBASE-8496_2.patch, HBASE-8496.patch,
> Tag design.pdf, Tag design_updated.pdf, Tag_In_KV_Buffer_For_reference.patch
>
>
> The intent of this JIRA comes from HBASE-7897.
> This would help us to decide on the structure and format of how the tags
> should look like.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
