[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13741866#comment-13741866
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-6721:
---------------------------------------
The current state of this issue is confusing. The parent is in 'Patch
Available' state but seems stale. Subtask #3 has been committed to trunk/0.96
and 0.94. Other subtasks are resolved as 'Invalid'. We should at least have a
release note describing what is going to be in 0.96 (and already in 0.94). What
further work is going to be done here? What been abandoned? Has enough
functionality been committed already to address the contributors' use case? Did
something turn out to be problematic? Nothing more for 0.96 since [~stack] has
frozen 0.95, correct? Nothing more need in 0.96 to support placing tables on
certain regionservers only (will help with 0.96 to 0.98 migration story)? I can
research the answers to my questions in commit history but maybe we can get an
authoritative answer from [~avandana] or [~toffer]?
> RegionServer Group based Assignment
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6721
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Francis Liu
> Assignee: Vandana Ayyalasomayajula
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: 6721-master-webUI.patch, HBASE-6721_10.patch,
> HBASE-6721_8.patch, HBASE-6721_94_2.patch, HBASE-6721_94_3.patch,
> HBASE-6721_94_3.patch, HBASE-6721_94_4.patch, HBASE-6721_94_5.patch,
> HBASE-6721_94_6.patch, HBASE-6721_94_7.patch, HBASE-6721_94.patch,
> HBASE-6721_94.patch, HBASE-6721_9.patch, HBASE-6721_9.patch,
> HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf,
> HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, HBASE-6721_trunk.patch, HBASE-6721_trunk.patch,
> HBASE-6721_trunk.patch
>
>
> In multi-tenant deployments of HBase, it is likely that a RegionServer will
> be serving out regions from a number of different tables owned by various
> client applications. Being able to group a subset of running RegionServers
> and assign specific tables to it, provides a client application a level of
> isolation and resource allocation.
> The proposal essentially is to have an AssignmentManager which is aware of
> RegionServer groups and assigns tables to region servers based on groupings.
> Load balancing will occur on a per group basis as well.
> This is essentially a simplification of the approach taken in HBASE-4120. See
> attached document.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
