[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13754212#comment-13754212
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-9334:
---------------------------------------
The rename in v4's shims breaks the compile -- the compiler would pick the
correct method, now because they have different names its broken and requires
more shim crap that would be removed by the next patch.
Applying HBASE-9359 after fixes the problem.
Are there any objections to me committing this when I commit HBASE-9359? (one
commit that fails to compile) The alternative would be to add code that would
get removed when applying HBASE-9359. I would note this in the commit message.
> Convert KeyValue to Cell in hbase-client module - Filters
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9334
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.95.2
> Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
> Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
> Attachments: hbase-9334.patch, hbase-9334.v2.patch,
> hbase-9334.v3.patch, hbase-9334.v4.patch
>
>
> The goal is is to remove KeyValue from the publicly exposed API and require
> clients to use the cleaner mroe encapsulated Cell API instead. For filters,
> this affects #filterKeyValue, #transform, #filterrow, and #getNextKeyHint.
> Since Cell is a base interface for KeyValue, changing these means that 0.94
> apps may need a recompile but probably no modifications.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
