[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13764862#comment-13764862
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9508:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12602657/9508.txt
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:red}-1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch failed to compile against the
hadoop 1.0 profile.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7159//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Restore some API mistakenly removed in client, mapred*, and common
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9508
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9508
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Usability
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: 9508.txt
>
>
> Here is contrib to the API compatibility story. I went over Aleks'
> compatibility report and restored removed or overriden methods and
> constructors, stuff that was in 0.94 non-deprecated and removed in 0.96.
> This patch is not comprehensive because some removals cannot be restored as
> in those that used take Writables (more on this later from Jon).
> The changes included here are mostly restore of methods that took a table
> name as a byte array replaced by a TableName object.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
