[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042545#comment-13042545
]
Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-3732:
-------------------------------------------
I wouldn't call it a vote, since there's no voting process in Apache for
requesting features. Contributors submit patches whether the rest of the
community likes it or not, then it's up to the committers to get them into SVN
if they want it or not.
My opinion is that this is something HBase should be doing by default, there
are too many advantages. I agree with Stack that it is easy to do at the
application level, but then if everyone starts doing then it really begs the
question as to why isn't HBase doing it in the first place.
> New configuration option for client-side compression
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3732
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3732
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Fix For: 0.92.0
>
> Attachments: compressed_streams.jar
>
>
> We have a case here where we have to store very fat cells (arrays of
> integers) which can amount into the hundreds of KBs that we need to read
> often, concurrently, and possibly keep in cache. Compressing the values on
> the client using java.util.zip's Deflater before sending them to HBase proved
> to be in our case almost an order of magnitude faster.
> There reasons are evident: less data sent to hbase, memstore contains
> compressed data, block cache contains compressed data too, etc.
> I was thinking that it might be something useful to add to a family schema,
> so that Put/Result do the conversion for you. The actual compression algo
> should also be configurable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
