[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13769167#comment-13769167
]
Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-9555:
--------------------------------------
Yeah it's bad naming. Pretty sure that 0.94 had the ability to set which lb to
use. So I didn't change the name just in case someone had derived something
from it. But then we put on interface audience private. I'm +1 on renaming it
to something like SimpleBalancer. But we run a small (very small in my
opinion) risk of breaking people.
So JMS seemed to think that documenting the config was worth it. Should we
just change the value to StochasticLoadBalancer ?
> Reset loadbalancer back to StochasticLoadBalancer
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9555
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9555
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Balancer
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>
> It seems like HBASE-7296 changed the loadbalancer class by mistake, removing
> a good deal of functionality.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
