[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13793468#comment-13793468
]
stack commented on HBASE-9749:
------------------------------
You don't want to override instead of replace here?
- public HTableWrapper(TableName tableName, HConnection connection) throws
IOException {
+ public HTableWrapper(TableName tableName, HConnection connection,
ExecutorService pool)
+ throws IOException {
...especially given it is going into a point release (0.94 or 0.96).
+1
(Talked to James this morning at the Vespas' game so got some background on why
you fellas need this)
> Custom threadpool for Coprocessor obtained HTables
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9749
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9749
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Coprocessors
> Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.94.13, 0.96.1
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Assignee: Jesse Yates
> Attachments: hbase-9749-0.94-v0.patch, hbase-9749-0.96-v0.patch,
> hbase-9749-trunk-v0.patch
>
>
> Coprocessors currently can only use the default HTable constructor that takes
> a single thread-pool.This is overly constrictive for coprocessors that desire
> tighter control over their resources.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
