[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13795030#comment-13795030
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9763:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12608453/HBASE-9763.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+0 tests included{color}. The patch appears to be a
documentation patch that doesn't require tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to
fail.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestLogRolling
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7544//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Scan javadoc doesn't fully capture semantics of start and stop row
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9763
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9763
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Gabriel Reid
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HBASE-9763.patch
>
>
> The current javadoc for Scan#setStartRow and Scan#setStopRow methods don't
> accurately capture the semantics of the use of row prefix values. Both
> methods describe the use of a trailing null byte to change the
> inclusive/exclusive the respective semantics of setStartRow and setStopRow.
> The use of a trailing null byte for start row exclusion only works in the
> case that exact full matching is done on row keys. The use of a trailing null
> byte for stop row inclusion has even more limitations (see HBASE-9035).
> The basic example is having the following rows:
> {code}
> AAB
> ABB
> BBC
> BCC
> {code}
> Setting the start row to A and the stop row to B will include AAB and AB.
> Setting the start row to A\x0 and the stop row to B\x0 will result in the
> same two rows coming out of the scan, instead of having an effect on the
> inclusion/exclusion semantics.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
