[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13797225#comment-13797225
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-9778:
--------------------------------------

[~jesse_yates], unfortunately we're skipping the column before we know the 
version count. What we could do is count versions of column that were not 
selected, and use that as an estimate for the expected number of versions of 
the selected columns. This seems easier and more reliable.

> Avoid seeking to next column in ExplicitColumnTracker when possible
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9778
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9778
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.94.13, 0.96.1
>
>         Attachments: 9778-0.94.txt, 9778-0.94-v2.txt, 9778-trunk.txt, 
> 9778-trunk-v2.txt
>
>
> The issue of slow seeking in ExplicitColumnTracker was brought up by 
> [~vrodionov] on the dev list.
> My idea here is to avoid the seeking if we know that there aren't many 
> versions to skip.
> How do we know? We'll use the column family's VERSIONS setting as a hint. If 
> VERSIONS is set to 1 (or maybe some value < 10) we'll avoid the seek and call 
> SKIP repeatedly.
> HBASE-9769 has some initial number for this approach:
> Interestingly it depends on which column(s) is (are) selected.
> Some numbers: 4m rows, 5 cols each, 1 cf, 10 bytes values, VERSIONS=1, 
> everything filtered at the server with a ValueFilter. Everything measured in 
> seconds.
> Without patch:
> ||Wildcard||Col 1||Col 2||Col 4||Col 5||Col 2+4||
> |6.4|8.5|14.3|14.6|11.1|20.3|
> With patch:
> ||Wildcard||Col 1||Col 2||Col 4||Col 5||Col 2+4||
> |6.4|8.4|8.9|9.9|6.4|10.0|
> Variation here was +- 0.2s.
> So with this patch scanning is 2x faster than without in some cases, and 
> never slower. No special hint needed, beyond declaring VERSIONS correctly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to