[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13800703#comment-13800703
]
Jean-Marc Spaggiari commented on HBASE-9775:
--------------------------------------------
Hum. I still have all those servers since all have the same CPU, motherboard
and memory (brand, model, etc.) but I changed from SATA to SSD on the one I
used for HBASE-6295 and I don't recall if I did that before the tests, or after
:( So I don't think we will be able to compare the results.
I can add a 3rd version to be run if you want. Just tell me which revision
number and I will run all the tests on the 3 versions.
As soon as I get your confirmation I start all of that.
> Client write path perf issues
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9775
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: Charts Search Cloudera Manager - ITBLL.png, Charts
> Search Cloudera Manager.png, hbase-9775.patch, job_run.log, short_ycsb.png,
> ycsb_insert_94_vs_96.png, ycsb.png
>
>
> Testing on larger clusters has not had the desired throughput increases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
