[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13801357#comment-13801357
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9810:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12609356/hbase-9810-trunk.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

    {color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to 
fail.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7594//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Global memstore size will be calculated wrongly if replaying recovered edits 
> throws exception
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9810
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9810
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>            Reporter: chunhui shen
>            Assignee: chunhui shen
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: hbase-9810-trunk.patch
>
>
> Recently we encountered such a case in 0.94-version:
> Flush is triggered frequently because:
> {noformat}DEBUG org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: Flush 
> thread woke up because memory above low water=14.4g
> {noformat}
> But, the real global memstore size is about 1g.
> It seems the global memstore size has been calculated wrongly.
> Through the logs, I find the following root cause log:
> {noformat}
> ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler: Failed 
> open of region=notifysub2_index,\x83\xDC^\xCD\xA3\x8A<\x
> E2\x8E\xE6\xAD!\xDC\xE8t\xED,1379148697072.46be7c2d71c555379278a7494df3015e., 
> starting to roll back the global memstore size.
> java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
>         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue.getFamily(KeyValue.java:1096)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.replayRecoveredEdits(HRegion.java:2933)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.replayRecoveredEditsIfAny(HRegion.java:2811)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.initializeRegionInternals(HRegion.java:583)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.initialize(HRegion.java:499)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:3939)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:3887)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler.openRegion(OpenRegionHandler.java:332)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler.process(OpenRegionHandler.java:108)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.executor.EventHandler.run(EventHandler.java:169)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> {noformat}
> Browse the code of this part, seems a critial bug about global memstore size 
> when replaying recovered edits.
> (RegionServerAccounting#clearRegionReplayEditsSize is called  for each edit 
> file, it means the roll back size is smaller than actual when calling 
> RegionServerAccounting#rollbackRegionReplayEditsSize)
> Anyway,  the solution is easy as the patch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to