[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13804420#comment-13804420
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9831:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12610112/HBASE-9831-0.94-v02.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7617//console

This message is automatically generated.

> 'hbasefsck.numthreads' property can not pass to hbck via generic option
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9831
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9831
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: hbck
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.12
>            Reporter: takeshi.miao
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: hbck
>             Fix For: 0.94.13
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-9831-0.94-v02.patch, HBASE-9831.v01.patch
>
>
> We use generic option way to pass _'hbasefsck.numthreads'_ property to 
> _'hbase hbck'_, but it does not accept our new setting value
> {code}
> hbase hbck -D hbasefsck.numthreads=5
> {code}
> We can still find there are threads over than 5 we already set via generic 
> opttion
> {code}
> [2013-10-24 
> 09:25:02,561][pool-2-thread-6][DEBUG][org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation]:
>  PrivilegedAction as:hbase/[email protected] 
> (auth:KERBEROS) from:sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
> Method) (UserGroupInformation.java:1430)
> [2013-10-24 
> 09:25:02,562][pool-2-thread-10][DEBUG][org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation]:
>  PrivilegedAction as:hbase/[email protected] 
> (auth:KERBEROS) from:sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
> Method) (UserGroupInformation.java:1430)
> [2013-10-24 
> 09:25:02,565][pool-2-thread-13][DEBUG][org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation]:
>  PrivilegedAction as:hbase/[email protected] 
> (auth:KERBEROS) from:sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
> Method) (UserGroupInformation.java:1430)
> [2013-10-24 
> 09:25:02,566][pool-2-thread-11][DEBUG][org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation]:
>  PrivilegedAction as:hbase/[email protected] 
> (auth:KERBEROS) from:sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
> Method) (UserGroupInformation.java:1430)
> [2013-10-24 
> 09:25:02,567][pool-2-thread-9][DEBUG][org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation]:
>  PrivilegedAction as:hbase/[email protected] 
> (auth:KERBEROS) from:sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
> Method) (UserGroupInformation.java:1430)
> [2013-10-24 
> 09:25:02,568][pool-2-thread-12][DEBUG][org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation]:
>  PrivilegedAction as:hbase/[email protected] 
> (auth:KERBEROS) from:sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
> Method) (UserGroupInformation.java:1430)
> [2013-10-24 
> 09:25:02,570][pool-2-thread-7][DEBUG][org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation]:
>  PrivilegedAction as:hbase/[email protected] 
> (auth:KERBEROS) from:sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
> Method) (UserGroupInformation.java:1430)
> [2013-10-24 
> 09:25:02,571][pool-2-thread-14][DEBUG][org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation]:
>  PrivilegedAction as:hbase/[email protected] 
> (auth:KERBEROS) from:sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
> Method) (UserGroupInformation.java:1430)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to