[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13807880#comment-13807880
 ] 

Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-5539:
----------------------------------------

The issue is that it PerformanceEvaluation is in hbase-server, so we will have 
the dependency spreads to all people who includes hbase-server (coprocessors 
writers at least).

With the patch as it is, netty version should be in the main hbase pom. HBase 
depends on an earlier version today, but it's not a big deal imho.
We still need this mess with org.slf4j in the pom?

Being able to easily compare the two clients is great. I'm not a big fan about 
adding another dependency to hbase-server (it's not AsyncHBase fault: 
PerformanceEvaluation should be somewhere else, or in its own module. It should 
not be that difficult to do, and we could do it in trunk for example. I might 
give it a try if nobody volunteers)...

> asynchbase PerformanceEvaluation
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5539
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5539
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Performance
>            Reporter: Benoit Sigoure
>            Assignee: Benoit Sigoure
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: benchmark
>             Fix For: 0.95.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation.patch, 
> 0001-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation.patch, 
> 0001-AsyncHBase-PerformanceEvaluation.patch, 
> 5539-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation-v2.txt, 
> 5539-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation-v3.txt, 
> 5539-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation-v4.txt, 
> 5539-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation-v5.txt
>
>
> I plugged [asynchbase|https://github.com/stumbleupon/asynchbase] into 
> {{PerformanceEvaluation}}.  This enables testing asynchbase from 
> {{PerformanceEvaluation}} and comparing its performance to {{HTable}}.  Also 
> asynchbase doesn't come with any benchmark, so it was good that I was able to 
> plug it into {{PerformanceEvaluation}} relatively easily.
> I am in the processing of collecting results on a dev cluster running 0.92.1 
> and will publish them once they're ready.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to