[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13808307#comment-13808307 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8541: ---------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12610867/HBASE-8541-v4.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.0 profile. {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile. {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 8 warning messages. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 5 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 {color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to fail. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in . Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7664//console This message is automatically generated. > implement flush-into-stripes in stripe compactions > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-8541 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8541 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin > Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin > Attachments: HBASE-8541-latest-with-dependencies.patch, > HBASE-8541-latest-with-dependencies.patch, > HBASE-8541-latest-with-dependencies.patch, > HBASE-8541-latest-with-dependencies.patch, HBASE-8541-v0.patch, > HBASE-8541-v1.patch, HBASE-8541-v2.patch, HBASE-8541-v3.patch, > HBASE-8541-v4.patch > > > Flush will be able to flush into multiple files under this design, avoiding > L0 I/O amplification. > I have the patch which is missing just one feature - support for concurrent > flushes and stripe changes. This can be done via extensive try-locking of > stripe changes and flushes, or advisory flags without blocking flushes, > dumping conflicting flushes into L0 in case of (very rare) collisions. For > file loading for the latter, a set-cover-like problem needs to be solved to > determine optimal stripes. That will also address Jimmy's concern of getting > rid of metadata, btw. However currently I don't have time for that. I plan to > attach the try-locking patch first, but this won't happen for a couple weeks > probably and should not block main reviews. Hopefully this will be added on > top of main reviews. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)