[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13815314#comment-13815314
 ] 

Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-9888:
-------------------------------------------

bq. That sounds great. Is that 0.94 only or do the newer versions also have it?

It's in trunk too.

bq. Do you have an idea where the minimum timestamp would be generated?

Once we get the zk event? Not sure.

bq. Would it work to just do it in each RS when the ReplicationSource on that 
RS is created (in the mode for add_peer)?

That's what I was proposing, sorry if not clear.

bq. Alternatively, should each RS roll its HLog when creating a new peer?

That could work but I'd rather not roll logs for this.

> HBase replicates edits written before the replication peer is created
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9888
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Dave Latham
>
> When creating a new replication peer the ReplicationSourceManager enqueues 
> the currently open HLog to the ReplicationSource to ship to the destination 
> cluster.  The ReplicationSource starts at the beginning of the HLog and ships 
> over any pre-existing writes.
> A workaround is to roll all the HLogs before enabling replication.
> A little background for how it affected us - we were migrating one cluster in 
> a master-master pair.  I.e. transitioning from A <\-> B to B <-> C.  After 
> shutting down writes from A -> B we enabled writes from C -> B.  However, 
> this replicated some earlier writes that were in C's HLogs that had 
> originated in A.  Since we were running a version of HBase before HBASE-7709 
> those writes then got caught in a infinite replication cycle and bringing 
> down region servers OOM because of HBASE-9865.
> However, in general, if one wants to manage what data gets replicated, one 
> wouldn't expect that potentially very old writes would be included when 
> setting up a new replication link.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to