[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822064#comment-13822064
 ] 

Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-9834:
------------------------------------

Looks like trunk/0.96 stuff doesn't need anything special because the move to 
cell doesn't make the same assumptions about a backing buffer and just goes 
through interfaces.

[~lhofhansl], what do you think about v3 for 0.94?

> Minimize byte[] copies for 'smart' clients
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9834
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9834
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>            Reporter: Jesse Yates
>            Assignee: Jesse Yates
>             Fix For: 0.94.14
>
>         Attachments: hbase-9834-0.94-v0.patch, hbase-9834-0.94-v1.patch, 
> hbase-9834-0.94-v2.patch, hbase-9834-0.94-v3.patch
>
>
> 'Smart' clients (e.g. phoenix) that have in-depth knowledge of HBase often 
> bemoan the extra byte[] copies that must be done when building multiple 
> puts/deletes. We should provide a mechanism by which they can minimize these 
> copies, but still remain wire compatible. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to