[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824315#comment-13824315
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9834:
---------------------------------------
{quote}
I now wonder how we can write a test to catch these.
Maybe generate a file will all kinds of a objects, save that. Then
read that back
regenerate and make sure it's identical
that way we ensured that neither readFields nor write has changed.
{quote}
Ok, HBASE-9981
> Minimize byte[] copies for 'smart' clients
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9834
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Assignee: Jesse Yates
> Fix For: 0.94.15
>
> Attachments: hbase-9834-0.94-v0.patch, hbase-9834-0.94-v1.patch,
> hbase-9834-0.94-v2.patch, hbase-9834-0.94-v3.patch
>
>
> 'Smart' clients (e.g. phoenix) that have in-depth knowledge of HBase often
> bemoan the extra byte[] copies that must be done when building multiple
> puts/deletes. We should provide a mechanism by which they can minimize these
> copies, but still remain wire compatible.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
