[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13828302#comment-13828302
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10007:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12615026/HBASE-10007-0.94.00.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 3 new
or modified tests.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7956//console
This message is automatically generated.
> PerformanceEvaluation: Add sampling and latency collection to randomRead test
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10007
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10007
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Performance, test
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1, 0.94.15
>
> Attachments: HBASE-10007-0.94.00.patch, HBASE-10007-0.96.00.patch,
> HBASE-10007-0.96.01.patch, HBASE-10007-0.96.02.patch, HBASE-10007.00.patch,
> HBASE-10007.01.patch
>
>
> As I mentioned over on HBASE-9940, I'd like to have randomRead operate only
> on a sample of the total dataset. It would also be useful to collect latency
> measurements from individual responses. Throughput times are aggregated
> according to the amount of user data processed and the result is reported as
> well. This is a patch I've been using for some performance tests I've run --
> maybe it'll be useful to someone else.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
