[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13829014#comment-13829014
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10017:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12615133/HBASE-10017-v0.94.6.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7962//console

This message is automatically generated.

> HRegionPartitioner, rows directed to last partition are wrongly mapped.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10017
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10017
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mapreduce
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.6
>            Reporter: Roman Nikitchenko
>             Fix For: 0.94.6
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-10017-v0.94.6.patch
>
>
> Inside HRegionPartitioner class there is getPartition() method which should 
> map first numPartitions regions to appropriate partitions 1:1. But based on 
> condition last region is hashed which could lead to last reducer not having 
> any data. This is considered serious issue.
> I reproduced this only starting from 16 regions per table. Original defect 
> was found in 0.94.6 but at least today's trunk and 0.91 branch head have the 
> same HRegionPartitioner code in this part which means the same issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to