[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13835020#comment-13835020
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9535:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616295/9535.v3.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8026//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Try a pool of direct byte buffers handling incoming ipc requests
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9535
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9535
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Attachments: 9535.v1.patch, 9535.v2.patch, 9535.v3.patch
>
>
> ipc takes in a query by allocating a ByteBuffer of the size of the request
> and then reading off the socket into this on-heap BB.
> Experiment with keeping a pool of BBs so we have some buffer reuse to cut on
> garbage generated. Could checkout from pool in RpcServer#Reader. Could
> check back into the pool when Handler is done just before it queues the
> response on the Responder's queue. We should be good since, at least for
> now, kvs get copied up into MSLAB (not references) when data gets stuffed
> into MemStore; this should make it so no references left over when we check
> the BB back into the pool for use next time around.
> If on-heap BBs work, we could then try direct BBs (Allocation of DBBs takes
> time so if already allocated, should be good. GC of DBBs is a pain but if in
> a pool, we shouldn't be wanting this to happen). The copy from socket to the
> DBB will be off-heap (should be fast).
> Could start w/ the HDFS DirectBufferPool. It is unbounded and keeps items by
> size (we might want to bypass the pool if an object is > size N).
> DBBs for this task would contend w/ offheap BBs used in BlockReadLocal when
> short-circuit reading. It'd be a bummer if we had to allocate big objects
> on-heap. Would still be an improvement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
