[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13841919#comment-13841919
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9892:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12617503/HBASE-9892-trunk-v1.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.1{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.1 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 2 new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to
fail.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMetricsRegionServerSourceImpl
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8080//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Add info port to ServerName to support multi instances in a node
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9892
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Liu Shaohui
> Assignee: Liu Shaohui
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1, 0.99.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-9892-0.94-v1.diff, HBASE-9892-0.94-v2.diff,
> HBASE-9892-0.94-v3.diff, HBASE-9892-0.94-v4.diff, HBASE-9892-0.94-v5.diff,
> HBASE-9892-trunk-v1.diff, HBASE-9892-trunk-v1.patch, HBASE-9892-v5.txt
>
>
> The full GC time of regionserver with big heap(> 30G ) usually can not be
> controlled in 30s. At the same time, the servers with 64G memory are normal.
> So we try to deploy multi rs instances(2-3 ) in a single node and the heap of
> each rs is about 20G ~ 24G.
> Most of the things works fine, except the hbase web ui. The master get the RS
> info port from conf, which is suitable for this situation of multi rs
> instances in a node. So we add info port to ServerName.
> a. at the startup, rs report it's info port to Hmaster.
> b, For root region, rs write the servername with info port ro the zookeeper
> root-region-server node.
> c, For meta regions, rs write the servername with info port to root region
> d. For user regions, rs write the servername with info port to meta regions
> So hmaster and client can get info port from the servername.
> To test this feature, I change the rs num from 1 to 3 in standalone mode, so
> we can test it in standalone mode,
> I think Hoya(hbase on yarn) will encounter the same problem. Anyone knows
> how Hoya handle this problem?
> PS: There are different formats for servername in zk node and meta table, i
> think we need to unify it and refactor the code.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
