[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13847947#comment-13847947
]
Jean-Marc Spaggiari commented on HBASE-9648:
--------------------------------------------
Hum. Looking at it again, I might be missing something.
Even if coprocessors can replace the scanner, that doesn't change the list of
store files, right? Or can the scanner make the compactor looking at another
set of store files?
> collection one expired storefile causes it to be replaced by another expired
> storefile
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9648
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9648
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Compaction
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Assignee: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
> Attachments: HBASE-9648-v0-0.94.patch, HBASE-9648-v0-trunk.patch,
> HBASE-9648-v1-trunk.patch, HBASE-9648-v2-trunk.patch, HBASE-9648.patch
>
>
> There's a shortcut in compaction selection that causes the selection of
> expired store files to quickly delete.
> However, there's also the code that ensures we write at least one file to
> preserve seqnum. This new empty file is "expired", because it has no data,
> presumably.
> So it's collected again, etc.
> This affects 94, probably also 96.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)
