[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13848040#comment-13848040
 ] 

Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-10150:
-------------------------------------

We already have to worry about the order of attachment, its really not a big 
deal. I'd rather see how this all comes together in a bigger patch, rather than 
these little patches - makes it easier to get an idea of how it all will work 
together. This has no use in and of itself - the others in your recent string 
of improvements have made sense as standalone changes.

Maybe create a parent issue where you layout the all the changes you want to 
make so we can talk about the best overall design?

> Write attachment Id of tested patch into JIRA comment
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10150
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10150
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: Ted Yu
>             Fix For: 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: 10150-v1.txt
>
>
> The optimization proposed in HBASE-10044 wouldn't work if QA bot doesn't know 
> the attachment Id of the most recently tested patch.
> The first step is to write attachment Id of tested patch into JIRA comment.
> For details, see HADOOP-10163



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Reply via email to