[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13852054#comment-13852054
]
Jean-Marc Spaggiari commented on HBASE-7846:
--------------------------------------------
No activity here and I think with online merge available in 0.96 there will not
be any traction.
[~kaufman] d you mind if I close this JIRA?
> Add support for merging implicit regions in Merge tool
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7846
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7846
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: util
> Reporter: Kaufman Ng
> Assignee: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HBASE-7846-v0-trunk.patch, HBASE-7846-v1-trunk.patch,
> HBASE-7846-v2-trunk.patch
>
>
> Currently org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Merge needs 2 region names to be
> explicitly specified to perform a merge. This can be cumbersome.
> One idea for improvement is to have Merge to figure out all the adjacent
> regions and perform the merges.
> For example:
> regions before merge: row-10, row-20, row-30, row-40, row-50
> regions after merge: row-10, row-30, row-50
> In the above example, region names of "row-10" and "row-20" are merged to
> become a new bigger region of "row-10".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)
