[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13858666#comment-13858666
]
Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-8458:
----------------------------------------
To me, the fact that multi is not available for checkAndXX (or increment) is
more or less a bug in the client api.
In 0.96+, the code for multiget and multiput is the same on the client side
(iirc multiexist is a subcase on get on 0.96). I did look at the other multis
when I worked on the client in the 0.96, but doing a proper work would have
cost more than a week of work, so I excluded it...
> Support for batch version of checkAndPut() and checkAndDelete()
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8458
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8458
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Client, regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.95.0
> Reporter: Hari Mankude
>
> The use case is that the user has multiple threads loading hundreds of keys
> into a hbase table. Occasionally there are collisions in the keys being
> uploaded by different threads. So for correctness, it is required to do
> checkAndPut() instead of a put(). However, doing a checkAndPut() rpc for
> every key update is non optimal. It would be good to have a batch version of
> checkAndPut() similar to batch put(). The client can partition the keys on
> region boundaries.
> The jira is NOT looking for any type of cross-row locking or multi-row
> atomicity with checkAndPut()
> Batch version of checkAndDelete() is a similar requirement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
