[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13868410#comment-13868410
 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1015:
---------------------------------------

bq. Another way to put this is that if nobody cares enough to even put up a 
patch after 5 years is this issue simply moot?

This issue has been superseded by the use of protobuf in RPCs instead of Thrift 
and the commit of the start of a C/C++ client library, see HBASE-9977. Closing 
this issue in lieu of something else is fine, but WONTFIX is the incorrect 
resolution.

> pure C and C++ client libraries
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1015
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1015
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.6
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Priority: Minor
>
> If via HBASE-794 first class support for talking via Thrift directly to 
> HMaster and HRS is available, then pure C and C++ client libraries are 
> possible. 
> The C client library would wrap a Thrift core. 
> The C++ client library can provide a class hierarchy quite close to 
> o.a.h.h.client and, ideally, identical semantics. It  should be just a 
> wrapper around the C API, for economy.
> Internally to my employer there is a lot of resistance to HBase because many 
> dev teams have a strong C/C++ bias. The real issue however is really client 
> side integration, not a fundamental objection. (What runs server side and how 
> it is managed is a secondary consideration.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to