[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13872252#comment-13872252
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-10123:
----------------------------------------
I looked briefly at iana -- maybe we should get all the hadoop related projects
together and register for to get an established well known protocol port range?
http://www.iana.org/form/ports-services
This will take a while so maybe we put this patch only in trunk and keep 0.98
as is since it would likely complicate any rolling upgrades from 0.96's.
Hopefully we can get some IANA numbers before what follows 0.98 is out?
> Change default ports; move them out of linux ephemeral port range
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10123
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10123
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.96.1.1
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.98.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-10123.patch, hbase-10123.v2.patch,
> hbase-10123.v3.patch
>
>
> Our defaults clash w/ the range linux assigns itself for creating come-and-go
> ephemeral ports; likely in our history we've clashed w/ a random, short-lived
> process. While easy to change the defaults, we should just ship w/ defaults
> that make sense. We could host ourselves up into the 7 or 8k range.
> See http://www.ncftp.com/ncftpd/doc/misc/ephemeral_ports.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
