[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13875265#comment-13875265
 ] 

Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-10374:
--------------------------------------

Premature submit. As I was a saying.

I don't have conclusive reasons to pursue Netty ByteBufs vs nio ByteBuffers. 
The compositional structure Netty provides is really nice, if we can use it, 
but I think it could be implemented on top of stock ByteBuffers as well.

> add jemalloc into the choice of memstore allocation 
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10374
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.1.1
>            Reporter: Bing Jiang
>            Priority: Minor
>
> https://blog.twitter.com/2013/netty-4-at-twitter-reduced-gc-overhead 
> introduced that Netty used jemalloc to gain benefits from GC.
> It can be a good choice for memstore block allocation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to