[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882196#comment-13882196
]
stack commented on HBASE-3909:
------------------------------
bq. Yes, this patch misses backup master, we can fix it with other patch.
Yes.
bq. Yes, at first these are some settings will be lost, we will not have all
settings take effect dynamic.
Pardon me. I don't follow. We can't lose the setting of short circuit reads
on reload of configs. Do you think this will happen? Can we add unit tests to
show server configs ride across the reload of configs? Thanks [~aoxiang]
> Add dynamic config
> ------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3909
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3909
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Subbu M Iyer
> Attachments: 3909-102812.patch, 3909-102912.patch, 3909-v1.patch,
> 3909.v1, 3909_090712-2.patch, HBASE-3909-backport-from-fb-for-trunk-2.patch,
> HBASE-3909-backport-from-fb-for-trunk.patch, HBase Cluster Config
> Details.xlsx, patch-v2.patch, testMasterNoCluster.stack
>
>
> I'm sure this issue exists already, at least as part of the discussion around
> making online schema edits possible, but no hard this having its own issue.
> Ted started a conversation on this topic up on dev and Todd suggested we
> lookd at how Hadoop did it over in HADOOP-7001
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
