[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13884467#comment-13884467
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-10421 at 1/28/14 7:28 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
I redid the test and this time I compiled everything myself.
0.98 is just as fast as 0.94 for my test (and both are slightly faster than
0.96).
All is good.
was (Author: lhofhansl):
I redid the test and this time I compiled everything myself.
0.98 is just as fast as 0.94 for my test (and both are slightly faster than
0.94).
All is good.
> Investigate scan performance in 0.96 and later
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10421
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10421
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.98.0
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>
> Testing the "internal friction" of scanning in HBase (all data in the block
> cache, and all rows filtered at the server by a ValueFilter, so that one
> really measures the work HBase does internally), I found that 0.98 is almost
> 35% slower than 0.94.
> Scanning 50m rows (one col each, 8 byte keys, 8 byte values) takes 13.2 in
> 0.94.17-SNAPSHOT and 18.5s in 0.98.
> This probably came about with all the protobuf changes in 0.96.
> It should be possible to bring back to par with 0.94.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
