[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13893571#comment-13893571
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10185:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12627355/10185.v1.patch
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12627355
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.1{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.1 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8614//console
This message is automatically generated.
> HBaseClient retries even though a DoNotRetryException was thrown
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10185
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10185
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: IPC/RPC
> Affects Versions: 0.94.12, 0.99.0
> Reporter: Samarth
> Fix For: 0.99.0
>
> Attachments: 10185.v1.patch
>
>
> Throwing a DoNotRetryIOException inside Writable.write(Dataoutput) method
> doesn't prevent HBase from retrying. Debugging the code locally, I figured
> that the bug lies in the way HBaseClient simply throws an IOException when it
> sees that a connection has been closed unexpectedly.
> Method:
> public Writable call(Writable param, InetSocketAddress addr,
> Class<? extends VersionedProtocol> protocol,
> User ticket, int rpcTimeout)
> Excerpt of code where the bug is present:
> while (!call.done) {
> if (connection.shouldCloseConnection.get()) {
> throw new IOException("Unexpected closed connection");
> }
> Throwing this IOException causes the ServerCallable.translateException(t) to
> be a no-op resulting in HBase retrying.
> From my limited view and understanding of the code, one way I could think of
> handling this is by looking at the closeConnection member variable of a
> connection to determine what kind of exception should be thrown.
> Specifically, when a connection is closed, the current code does this:
> protected synchronized void markClosed(IOException e) {
> if (shouldCloseConnection.compareAndSet(false, true)) {
> closeException = e;
> notifyAll();
> }
> }
> Within HBaseClient's call method, the code could possibly be modified to:
> while (!call.done) {
> if (connection.shouldCloseConnection.get() ) {
> if(connection.closeException instanceof
> DoNotRetryIOException) {
> throw closeException;
> }
> throw new IOException("Unexpected closed connection");
> }
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
