[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13907743#comment-13907743
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10578:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12630192/HBASE-10578-v2.patch
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12630192
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 4 new
or modified tests.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8761//console
This message is automatically generated.
> For the same row key, the KV in the newest StoreFile should be returned
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10578
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10578
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scanners
> Affects Versions: 0.89-fb, 0.98.1
> Reporter: Amitanand Aiyer
> Assignee: Amitanand Aiyer
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.89-fb
>
> Attachments: HBASE-10578-v2.patch, HBASE-10578.patch
>
>
> When multiple scanners have the same KV, HBase should pick the "newest" one.
> i.e. pick the KV from the store file with the largest seq id.
> In the KeyValueHeap generalizedSeek implementation, we seem to prefer the
> "current"
> scanner over the scanners in the heap -- THIS IS WRONG.
> The diff adds a unit test to make sure that bulk loads correctly. And fixes
> the issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
