[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13923560#comment-13923560
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-10531:
------------------------------------------------
bq.If we already create one of your derived KVs there we'd save yet another
copy.
Yes. Should be.
bq.That's unexpected. These both generate Get requests, right?
Am not getting the real reason for that. May be can give another try with the
YCSB. That would be better I feel.
> Revisit how the key byte[] is passed to HFileScanner.seekTo and reseekTo
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10531
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10531
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 0.99.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-10531.patch, HBASE-10531_1.patch,
> HBASE-10531_2.patch
>
>
> Currently the byte[] key passed to HFileScanner.seekTo and
> HFileScanner.reseekTo, is a combination of row, cf, qual, type and ts. And
> the caller forms this by using kv.getBuffer, which is actually deprecated.
> So see how this can be achieved considering kv.getBuffer is removed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
