[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13964389#comment-13964389
 ] 

Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-10932:
--------------------------------------------

bq.  Because of have some import online businesses in my clusters, any 
unnecessary heavy IO could unacceptable.

Isn't that a resource management concern? Won't using a proper scheduler on 
MapReduce or YARN be way more effective than relying on HBase users setting a 
number of scans?

bq.  Jean-Daniel Cryans focus on code style 

I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding you, but I'm not following what you're trying 
to say here.

> Improve RowCounter to allow mapper number set/control
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10932
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10932
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mapreduce
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-10932_v1.patch, HBASE-10932_v2.patch
>
>
> The typical use case of RowCounter is to do some kind of data integrity 
> checking, like after exporting some data from RDBMS to HBase, or from one 
> HBase cluster to another, making sure the row(record) number matches. Such 
> check commonly won't require much on response time.
> Meanwhile, based on current impl, RowCounter will launch one mapper per 
> region, and each mapper will send one scan request. Assuming the table is 
> kind of big like having tens of regions, and the cpu core number of the whole 
> MR cluster is also enough, the parallel scan requests sent by mapper would be 
> a real burden for the HBase cluster.
> So in this JIRA, we're proposing to make rowcounter support an additional 
> option "--maps" to specify mapper number, and make each mapper able to scan 
> more than one region of the target table.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to