[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13965070#comment-13965070
]
Matt Corgan commented on HBASE-10861:
-------------------------------------
{quote}In HBASE-10771 we had some discussion regarding that. Matt Corgan mind
taking a look at the patch on that Jira.{quote}sure, i left some comments over
there.
{quote}So do we have a consensus regarding the BR backed by offheap ?{quote}i
hate advocate too strongly for it since there are so many unknowns, but I do
think we need some sort of wrapper object for byte[]'s and ByteBuffers. i just
think it strange that java doesn't include a wrapper for byte[]'s like String
wraps char[]. The biggest difference from String is that we're talking about a
mutable wrapper, but I think we could get a lot of mileage out of recycling the
ByteRange wrapper in performance critical spots - just need to be careful.
> Supporting API in ByteRange
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10861
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10861
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Attachments: HBASE-10861.patch, HBASE-10861_2.patch
>
>
> We would need APIs that would
> setLimit(int limit)
> getLimt()
> asReadOnly()
> These APIs would help in implementations that have Buffers offheap (for now
> BRs backed by DBB).
> If anything more is needed could be added when needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
