[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13967036#comment-13967036
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10964:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12639843/HBASE-10964.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12639843

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 findbugs{color}.  The patch appears to introduce 1 new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9260//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Delete mutation is not consistent with Put wrt timestamp
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10964
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10964
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>         Attachments: HBASE-10964.patch
>
>
> We have       Put constructors which take ts param
> eg: Put(byte[] row, long ts)
> When one creates a Put this way and add columns to it, without giving a 
> specific TS, these individual cells will honour this Put object's TS. One can 
> use add API which takes a TS and so can override TS for this Cell.
> For delete also we have similar constructors with and without TS params and 
> delete***() APIs same way as add(). But delete***() APIs (without taking a 
> specific TS) is not honouring the Delete object's TS.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to