[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13980534#comment-13980534
 ] 

Mikhail Antonov commented on HBASE-11059:
-----------------------------------------

Curious if there's any writeup following up on the discussion you mentioned 
above? Eager to look at.

Based on the description, just some thoughts:

 - is that a part of more generic proposal to have system tables, which can be 
pinned (all regions thereof) to a certain node, or it's just to solve this 
specific problem?
 - sounds like (correct me if I'm wrong) to make the HA/failover work properly, 
the consistent replicas of such a table(-s) should be kept on each backup 
master (and further when we have multiple active master, on active masters)?

> ZK-less region assignment
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11059
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11059
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: master, Region Assignment
>            Reporter: Jimmy Xiang
>            Assignee: Jimmy Xiang
>
> It seems that most people don't like region assignment with ZK (HBASE-5487), 
> which causes many uncertainties. This jira is to support ZK-less region 
> assignment. We need to make sure this patch doesn't break backward 
> compatibility/rolling upgrade.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to