[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14004155#comment-14004155
 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9905:
---------------------------------------

bq. What about features like TTL that based on wall clock time? Are we going to 
unsupport them (unless the client sets the TSs)?

I think auto expiration and background garbage collection of data is still a 
valid use case for HBase. We would need an option that selects timestamps set 
by server time. If this option is active we'd filter expired cells based on 
timestamp and TTL settings as today. If the user has chosen some other type of 
timestamp scheme, it's ok for TTL settings to be ignored or disallowed. 

bq. Or maybe we can have a more coarse grained TTL where for every hfile from 
flush we keep the timestamp, and delete hfiles in compaction once expired.

The trouble with this is it could be too coarse grained. If not taking writes 
and with major compaction disabled a region could carry those 'expired' HFiles 
for a long time.

> Enable using seqId as timestamp 
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9905
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9905
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>
> This has been discussed previously, and Lars H. was mentioning an idea from 
> the client to declare whether timestamps are used or not explicitly. 
> The problem is that, for data models not using timestamps, we are still 
> relying on clocks to order the updates. Clock skew, same milisecond puts 
> after deletes, etc can cause unexpected behavior and data not being visible.  
> We should have a table descriptor / family property, which would declare that 
> the data model does not use timestamps. Then we can populate this dimension 
> with the seqId, so that global ordering of edits are not effected by wall 
> clock. 
> For example, META will use this. 
> Once we have something like this, we can think of making it default for new 
> tables, so that the unknowing user will not shoot herself in the foot. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to