[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14020434#comment-14020434
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11052:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12648735/HBASE-11052_0.94_v3.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12648735

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9712//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Sending random data crashes thrift service
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11052
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11052
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Thrift
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.1, 1.0.0, 0.94.18
>            Reporter: Adrian Muraru
>             Fix For: 1.0.0, 0.94.21, 0.98.4
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-11052_0.94_v2.patch, HBASE-11052_0.94_v3.patch, 
> HBASE-11052_trunk_v1.patch, HBASE-11052_trunk_v2.patch
>
>
> Upstream thrift library has a know issue (THRIFT-601) causing the thrift 
> server to crash with an Out-of-Memory Error when bogus requests are sent.
> This reproduces when a very large request size is sent in the request header, 
> making the thrift server to allocate a large memory segment leading to OOM.
> LoadBalancer health checks are the first "candidate" for bogus requests
> Thrift developers admit this is a known issue with TBinaryProtocol and their 
> recommandation is to use TCompactProtocol/TFramedTransport but this requires 
> all thrift clients to be updated (might not be feasible atm)
> So we need a fix similar to CASSANDRA-475.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to