[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14025536#comment-14025536
 ] 

Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-11059:
-------------------------------------

[~jeffreyz], yes, it needs meta/master colocation. This patch makes sure only 
master updates the meta.
[~toffer], I also set hbase.bulk.assignment.waittillallassigned to true since 
I'd like to get the assignment time only. I didn't change forceSync. So the 
default value should be used. The reason we need HBASE-10569 is that the patch 
talks to the meta region directly in persisting region state changes. If meta 
is on a different server, the performance shouldn't be the same. The new 
deployment is used in my testing. But the original deployment is still 
supported, with some performance hurt of course.

> ZK-less region assignment
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11059
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11059
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: master, Region Assignment
>            Reporter: Jimmy Xiang
>            Assignee: Jimmy Xiang
>             Fix For: 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-11059.patch, hbase-11059_v2.1.patch, 
> hbase-11059_v2.patch, zk-less_am.pdf
>
>
> It seems that most people don't like region assignment with ZK (HBASE-5487), 
> which causes many uncertainties. This jira is to support ZK-less region 
> assignment. We need to make sure this patch doesn't break backward 
> compatibility/rolling upgrade.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to