[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14037391#comment-14037391
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-11118:
-------------------------------

bq. First off, I'm not Daniel 

Sorry [~david.yu].  I messed up.  

bq. Would hadoop consider moving to your forked protobuf?

This would work for future hadoops but not for what is currently out in the 
world (folks tend to mix and match what version runs on what).  Besides, by the 
time it was widely available, we'll be up on protostuff so won't matter (smile).

[~fs111] Ok. Thanks.  So, the exception stack is same as over in HBASE-10304?  
You are coming in via TableMapReduceUtil (from mapred package?)  Thanks.

> non environment variable solution for "IllegalAccessError: class 
> com.google.protobuf.ZeroCopyLiteralByteString cannot access its superclass 
> com.google.protobuf.LiteralByteString"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11118
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.2
>            Reporter: André Kelpe
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: 1118.suggested.undoing.optimization.on.clientside.txt, 
> 1118.suggested.undoing.optimization.on.clientside.txt, 
> HBASE-11118-0.98.patch.gz, HBASE-11118-trunk.patch.gz, shade_attempt.patch
>
>
> I am running into the problem described in 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10304, while trying to use a 
> newer version within cascading.hbase 
> (https://github.com/cascading/cascading.hbase).
> One of the features of cascading.hbase is that you can use it from lingual 
> (http://www.cascading.org/projects/lingual/), our SQL layer for hadoop. 
> lingual has a notion of providers, which are fat jars that we pull down 
> dynamically at runtime. Those jars give users the ability to talk to any 
> system or format from SQL. They are added to the classpath  programmatically 
> before we submit jobs to a hadoop cluster.
> Since lingual does not know upfront , which providers are going to be used in 
> a given run, the HADOOP_CLASSPATH trick proposed in the JIRA above is really 
> clunky and breaks the ease of use we had before. No other provider requires 
> this right now.
> It would be great to have a programmatical way to fix this, when using fat 
> jars.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to